Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Council ‘not currently in a position’ to decide on visitor levy

21 Sep 2026 4 minute read
Static caravans in mobile home caravan park

Dale Spridgeon, Local Democracy Reporter

A decision on whether to introduce a visitor levy in a north Wales county looks set to be delayed after a public consultation attracted almost 7,000 responses.

Following a “significant response” to a public consultation, with 6,856 responses, Cyngor Gwynedd said it now needs more time to fully assess the details.

Initial analysis of data had showed strong opposition by businesses and visitors, while local residents were split on the tourism tax.

The levy is due to be discussed at a full council meeting of Cyngor Gwynedd on Thursday, September 24.

A report states: “The decision sought is to accept the report; and agree to receive a complete report to decide whether or not to introduce a Visitor Levy in Gwynedd once the analysis, consideration and response to the content of the Consultation have been fully and appropriately completed.”

The Council was due to present a report on September 24, 2026, and to provide a 12 months’ notice to the Welsh Revenue Authority (WRA) over an intention to introduce the Levy, to allow its collection  from October 1, 2027.

There are only two opportunities in any year to submit notice of an intention on April 1 or October 1.

The public consultation had run from May 20 to July 26, 2026, and had been extended by 11 days, following a request by the Gwynedd and Eryri 2035 Partnership, at special meeting to discuss the levy on June 12, 2026.

Considering the extension, and the high number of responses received, and the range of issues raised, the report stated it was “not currently in a position to make a decision”.

It  had received “clear legal advice that it is not possible to proceed with a decision on the levy in September, 2026″, as originally intended, as it had “not been possible to analyse, process and consider all the consultation responses within the available timeframe”.

It added: “The full range of information, factors and evidence in response to the consultation has not yet been prepared and presented in a form suitable for submission to the Council.

“Consequently, the Council would not be able to give the matter full consideration before reaching a decision.”

The report noted the response to the public consultation had been “significant” and “exceeded expectations.”

A total of 6,856 responses were received after views of residents, businesses, visitors and stakeholders were sought, and was considerably higher when compared with the 2,000 responses received on Anglesey, and 1,300 in Conwy.

Based on initial analysis, figures had shown, 48.7% of Gwynedd residents had supported the Visitor Levy proposal, with just slightly fewer at 43.5% opposing.

Only 14.7% of businesses had supported it, while 79.5% had opposed and only 10.7% of visitors had supported, whilst 79.9% opposed.

When considering the overall response, including visitors, residents and businesses, 22.7% supported the Visitor Levy Proposal and 68.5% had opposed.

The report noted: “It should be remembered that this was not a consultation on whether respondents were ‘for’ or ‘against’ the Gwynedd Visitor Levy Proposal. Rather, it was a consultation to identify the potential impacts of introducing a Visitor Levy in the County and to assist in reaching a decision.”

It was proposed that a report be presented to a meeting of the full council asking it to decide whether a Visitor Levy should be introduced in Gwynedd, once the work of “analysing, considering and responding to the consultation was completed”.

“As a result of the delay to the timetable, it is not currently possible to determine when the relevant notice can be submitted to the Welsh Revenue Authority.

“This will depend on when the report is presented to the Full Council, and on the Council’s decision as to whether a Visitor Levy should be introduced in Gwynedd.”

The levy would charge a nightly rate, for people staying overnight in visitor
accommodation, such as hotels, bed & breakfast, self-catering accommodation, holiday caravans, campsites, hostels and shared accommodation.

Fees for hostels, shared rooms and tent pitches would be 75p + VAT (£0.90) per person per night, whilst most other types of accommodation; hotels, B&Bs, self-catering, caravans etc, would be charged at £1.30 + VAT (£1.56).

Exceptions would include visitors under the age of 18 and staying in tent pitches or shared accommodation, and where a stay lasts more than 31 nights within a single booking. and where accommodation was emergency or temporary housing arranged by a local authority.

Money raised from the levy would be reinvested locally to support communities, culture, the Welsh language, the environment, facilities and infrastructure.

The move comes after neighbouring Conwy councillors agreed to defer introducing a visitor levy following their own public consultation, which also found overall opposition to the proposed charge.

Conwy councillors said they wanted to wait for further evidence and practical experience from other Welsh councils before deciding whether to proceed.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


Get more trusted Welsh news

Choose Nation.Cymru as a preferred source in Google News to see more of our journalism.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jeff
Jeff
21 hours ago

Turning into a right mess. Looking like it should have come out a policy from the bay to the councils, not allowing councils to mess it up.

Ap Kenneth
Ap Kenneth
20 hours ago

The high response rate is because Haven and other big operators have been emailing customers asking them to respond negatively to the consultation. Customers are not given any balance as to the reasoning for making such a charge and the operators want to enhance their profit margins. You have to consider the motivations for people responding, saving money on a potential holiday as opposed to a more nuanced story of improving facilities when you visit at some time in the future.

Dom
Dom
19 hours ago
Reply to  Ap Kenneth

Are these customers council tax payers? Only council tax payers in the relevant council area should be consulted because they are the ones paying to clean up after tourists today. They are also the only ones voting in the council elections next May.

Last edited 19 hours ago by Dom
Ap Kenneth
Ap Kenneth
12 hours ago
Reply to  Dom

Of course they are not, by a very big margin. I am also very cynical regarding the park operators as Haven bring in a lot of seasonal workers from outside of Wales.

Dom
Dom
6 hours ago
Reply to  Ap Kenneth

The problem with consultations is they are too easily gamed by vested interests, dominated by bored retirees and suffer huge selection bias because those who are fine with the plans don’t bother responding.

Jeff
Jeff
19 hours ago
Reply to  Ap Kenneth

No doubt about it. See 20 mph petition. Gamed.

Locals left to pick up the bill again.

Rhufawn Jones
Rhufawn Jones
12 hours ago

Of course the response is negative. Because we all know that Wales only exists for the convenience of England.

Brychan
Brychan
12 hours ago

So the majority of the residents, who are also voters and council taxpayers, want the levy introduced forthwith. Living in Cheshire owning a holiday let in Gwynedd, the objectors, is of no concern. Get on with it.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.